Systems and methods for automated certificate renewal management

ABSTRACT

A method is provided for automating management of automatic renewal of a public key infrastructure (PKI) certificate issued by a certificate authority (CA) for a subscriber. The method includes steps of causing the subscriber to (i) transmit a first alert to a management entity for initiating renewal of the PKI certificate, and (ii) transmit a certificate signing request (CSR) to a registration authority (RA) for issuance of a renewal certificate. The method further includes steps of (iii) transmitting, from the RA to the CA, the CSR signed by the RA, (iv) receiving, at the RA from the CA, an issued renewal certificate signed by the CA, (v) sending, from the RA to the subscriber, the issued renewal certificate signed by the CA, and (vi) causing the subscriber to transmit a second alert to a management entity indicating renewal of the PKI certificate.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/544,895, filed Aug. 19, 2019, which claims the benefit of andpriority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/719,232, filedAug. 17, 2018, both of which are incorporated herein by reference intheir entirety.

BACKGROUND

The field of the disclosure relates generally to management of securitycertificates, and more particularly, to management of automatedcertificate renewal in a public key infrastructure (PKI) ecosystem.

Many conventional electronic devices, computer networks, computerprograms, and other entities (referred to individually and collectivelyherein as “subscribers”) utilize PKI to validate an electronic signatureof the subscriber in a variety of technology fields, such astelecommunications (e.g., mobile communication devices), the Internet ofThings (IoT), online banking, secure email, and e-commerce. PKI uses apair of cryptographic keys (e.g., one public and one private) to encryptand decrypt data, such that subscriber devices and modules may obtainand renew, for example, X.509 Certificates, which are used to establishtrust between devices and encrypt communications using such protocols asTransport Layer Security (TLS), etc.

A PKI ecosystem includes policies and procedures for encrypting publickeys, as well as the creation, management, distribution, usage, storage,and revocation of digital certificates. The PKI binds the public keys tothe identity of a person or legal entity associated with the subscriber,typically through a trusted Certificate Authority (CA). The PKIhierarchy identifies a chain of trust for a device or program, andfurther may provide secure software download requirements for thedevices/programs, and/or secure certificate injection requirements onthe device manufacturers or program users. The CA, subscribers,electronic devices, device manufacturers, and other users interact overthe PKI ecosystem.

Over time, the PKI digital Certificates may need to be renewed orrevoked for a variety of reasons, such as, the encryption keysassociated with the Certificate have been compromised or subject to timelimitations, there are errors within an issued Certificate, there is achange in usage of the Certificate, or the Certificate owner is nolonger deemed to be trusted. Some conventional renewal and revocationprocesses utilize a Certificate Revocation List (CRL) or an OnlineCertificate Status Protocol (OCSP). The CRL is a list of revokedCertificates (e.g., by serial number) that have been issued and thensubsequently revoked by a given CA. CRLs are generally published on aperiodic interval or can be published only when a Certificate is revokedby the CA.

The Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) was originally introducedto overcome limitations relating to the use of CRLs. An OCSP may beimplemented, for example, in the case where a subscriber computer devicereceives a Certificate, such as an X.509 Certificate, through a webbrowser, and is required to verify the information related to arevocation status of the Certificate. To proceed, the subscriber devicelooks up the server where the information relating to the revocationstatus may be found (e.g., by using one or more URLs embedded in theCertificate, or by using locally configured options). In some cases, thetransport protocol, such as raw TCP, requires the submission of an OCSPrequest to determine the status of the Certificate. In these situations,the user computer device generates the OCSP request and transmits thequery to an OCSP responder. The OCSP responder responds with an OCSPresponse that includes information about the revocation status of theCertificate.

Thus, conventional device access and network authentication processesoften leverage manually integrated asymmetric key pairs andcorresponding PKI Certificates issued (i.e., signed) through acentralized trust authority (e.g., the CA). When the Certificatesexpire, the Certificates are either: (i) revoked, and cannot bereplaced, updated, or renewed; or (ii) renewed, but require manualintegration of new asymmetric key pairs, and corresponding newCertificates, for further use.

Conventional certificate renewal schemes leverage on-line certificaterenewal systems which themselves leverage automatic certificate issuanceprocesses using protocols such as Simple Certificate Enrollment Protocol(SCEP) and Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST). Implementation ofthese conventional protocols, however, has introduced securityweaknesses into the PKI ecosystems in which they are employed, throughinadequate validation of the Certificates and/or PKI subscribers to theecosystem. Both protocols, for example, transmit/receive messagesto/from the CA, but require that the messages be signed with apre-existing Certificate in order to enroll for a new Certificate withthe CA. EST, in particular, outsources its TLS to a standard TLS, whichadds an additional challenge for constrained devices lacking dedicatecode-space for TLS implementation. Accordingly, there is a need forimproved systems and methods for automatic certificate renewal.

SUMMARY

In an embodiment, a method is provided for automating management ofautomatic renewal of a public key infrastructure (PKI) certificateissued by a certificate authority (CA) for a subscriber. The methodincludes steps of causing the subscriber to (i) transmit a first alertto a management entity for initiating renewal of the PKI certificate,and (ii) transmit a certificate signing request (CSR) to a registrationauthority (RA) for issuance of a renewal certificate. The method furtherincludes a step of transmitting, from the RA to the CA, the CSR signedby the RA. The method further includes a step of receiving, at the RAfrom the CA, an issued renewal certificate signed by the CA. The methodfurther includes a step of sending, from the RA to the subscriber, theissued renewal certificate signed by the CA. The method further includesa step of causing the subscriber to transmit a second alert to amanagement entity indicating renewal of the PKI certificate.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the presentdisclosure will become better understood when the following detaileddescription is read with reference to the following accompanyingdrawings, in which like characters represent like parts throughout thedrawings.

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a certificate renewal system, inaccordance with an embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a sequence diagram illustrating an exemplary certificaterenewal process, in accordance with an embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a sequence diagram illustrating an enhanced certificaterenewal process, in accordance with an embodiment.

Unless otherwise indicated, the drawings provided herein are meant toillustrate features of embodiments of this disclosure. These featuresare believed to be applicable in a wide variety of systems including oneor more embodiments of this disclosure. As such, the drawings are notmeant to include all conventional features known by those of ordinaryskill in the art to be required for the practice of the embodimentsdisclosed herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following specification and the claims, reference will be made toa number of terms, which shall be defined to have the followingmeanings.

The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unlessthe context clearly dictates otherwise.

“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described eventor circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includesinstances where the event occurs and instances where it does not.

Approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification andclaims, may be applied to modify any quantitative representation thatcould permissibly vary without resulting in a change in the basicfunction to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a termor terms, such as “about,” “approximately,” and “substantially,” are notto be limited to the precise value specified. In at least someinstances, the approximating language may correspond to the precision ofan instrument for measuring the value. Here and throughout thespecification and claims, range limitations may be combined and/orinterchanged; such ranges are identified and include all the sub-rangescontained therein unless context or language indicates otherwise.

As used herein, the terms “processor” and “computer” and related terms,e.g., “processing device”, “computing device”, and “controller” are notlimited to just those integrated circuits referred to in the art as acomputer, but broadly refers to a microcontroller, a microcomputer, aprogrammable logic controller (PLC), an application specific integratedcircuit (ASIC), and other programmable circuits, and these terms areused interchangeably herein. In the embodiments described herein, memorymay include, but is not limited to, a computer-readable medium, such asa random access memory (RAM), and a computer-readable non-volatilemedium, such as flash memory. Alternatively, a floppy disk, a compactdisc-read only memory (CD-ROM), a magneto-optical disk (MOD), and/or adigital versatile disc (DVD) may also be used. Also, in the embodimentsdescribed herein, additional input channels may be, but are not limitedto, computer peripherals associated with an operator interface such as amouse and a keyboard. Alternatively, other computer peripherals may alsobe used that may include, for example, but not be limited to, a scanner.Furthermore, in the exemplary embodiment, additional output channels mayinclude, but not be limited to, an operator interface monitor.

Further, as used herein, the terms “software” and “firmware” areinterchangeable, and include any computer program storage in memory forexecution by personal computers, workstations, clients, and servers.

As used herein, the term “non-transitory computer-readable media” isintended to be representative of any tangible computer-based deviceimplemented in any method or technology for short-term and long-termstorage of information, such as, computer-readable instructions, datastructures, program modules and sub-modules, or other data in anydevice. Therefore, the methods described herein may be encoded asexecutable instructions embodied in a tangible, non-transitory, computerreadable medium, including, without limitation, a storage device and amemory device. Such instructions, when executed by a processor, causethe processor to perform at least a portion of the methods describedherein. Moreover, as used herein, the term “non-transitorycomputer-readable media” includes all tangible, computer-readable media,including, without limitation, non-transitory computer storage devices,including, without limitation, volatile and nonvolatile media, andremovable and non-removable media such as a firmware, physical andvirtual storage, CD-ROMs, DVDs, and any other digital source such as anetwork or the Internet, as well as yet to be developed digital means,with the sole exception being a transitory, propagating signal.

As used herein, “CA” refers to a Certificate Authority hosting a RootCertificate, and may further include, without limitation, one or more ofa CA computer system, a CA server, a CA webpage, and a CA web service.The CA entity may include hardware and/or software to enable the entityto issue, manage, revoke, and renew PKI Certificates. As used herein,“Sub-CA” may refer to a subordinate CA issued directly from a Root CA(i.e., the CA hosting the Root Certificate), and which enables morespecific policy implementations while protecting the Root CA fromundesired exposure.

As used herein, “OCSP” refers to an Internet protocol used for obtainingthe revocation status of an X.509 digital Certificate.

As used herein, “PKI” generally refers to a public key infrastructureincluding a set of policies, processes, server platforms, software,and/or workstations used for the purpose of administering certificatesand public-private key pairs, and which may further include capabilitiesto issue, maintain, and/or revoke public key Certificates.

As used herein, “MA,” refers to a management authority entity providingtrust management services to support the ecosystem in meeting itssecurity goals using the PKI.

As used herein, “Subscriber” is intended to refer to an entityrequesting a Certificate (e.g., a manufacturer, cable operator,registering device, etc.), and which is authorized to use, and capableof using, the private key corresponding to the public key listed in aparticular Certificate.

As used herein, “RA,” refers to a registration authority entity forcollecting and verifying each Subscriber's identity and the informationthat is to be entered into the public key Certificate. The RA may beresponsible for accepting requests for digital Certificates andauthenticating the entity making the request.

The embodiments described herein provide systems and methods forenhanced PKI management, as well as the automated management ofautomatic PKI certificate renewal. In an exemplary embodiment, thepresent systems and methods provide innovative and enhance techniquesfor automated Certificate renewal with revocation capability. Thepresent automated management schemes represent significant improvementsover conventional systems that, even where the a PKI Certificate may beautomatically renewed, the management of such renewals still requiresmanual intervention.

The present embodiments are fully compatible with existing Certificateprocesses that leverage existing RFC 5280-compliant processes (i.e.,according to Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate andCRL Profile), and further advantageously enable further augmentation byadded certificate extensions (if desired). In an exemplary embodiment,methods for automatically managing the renewal of PKI Certificatesinclude additional security mechanisms to limit unauthorized use ofCertification through integrated revocation.

In an exemplary embodiment, the present systems and methods may utilizean X.509 trust model, in which a trusted central or third party CA isresponsible for signing digital Certificates. Accordingly, as describedherein, the CA is presumed to have capability to store one or moretrusted Root Certificates (or intermediate Certificates) as well as thecorresponding private keys. The CA is further responsible formaintaining up-to-date revocation information regarding the validity ofissued Certificates, and will provide information to the other parties,for example, through CRL or the OCSP. OCSP messages may be communicated,for example, by Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) encoding over theHypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), from and to OCSP responders of theCA server (or OCSP server).

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a certificate renewal system 100.In an exemplary embodiment, system 100 represents a trust frameworkarchitecture for an exemplary PKI ecosystem, and is configured to manageand monitor trust throughout the ecosystem and implement access amongthe various parties thereto. System 100 is provided by way of example,for illustrative purposes, and is not intended to be limiting. Other PKIframeworks/architectures may implement the present techniques withoutdeparting from the scope of the present embodiments. Furthermore, forease of explanation, some components that may be implemented withinsystem 100 are not illustrated in FIG. 1 , and system 100 mayadditionally include some generic hardware structure or softwarefunctionality, to facilitate operable communication among ecosystemcomponents, but which also is not illustrated in FIG. 1 .

In the exemplary embodiment depicted in FIG. 1 , system 100 includes aCA 102, an RA 104, a Subscriber 106, and a Management Entity 108. Insome embodiments, system 100 further includes a Revocation ManagementEntity 110. In some embodiments, CA 102 is a trusted central or thirdparty single CA entity configured for hosting the Root Certificate. Inother embodiments, CA 102 constitutes a Root CA 112 in communicationwith one or more issuing Sub-CAs 114. In such cases, Root CA 112 mayrepresent the highest level of CA hierarchy and serve as the trustanchor.

Sub-CAs 114 may then exist below Root CA 112 and define and authorizetypes of Certificates that may be requested from Root CA 112. Forexample, separate Sub-CAs 114 may be disposed at different respectivelocations, or a first Sub-CA 114 may be dedicated for Certificateshaving ECC keys, whereas a second Sub-CA 114 may be for Certificateshaving RSA keys. In some embodiments, CA 102 may represent a hierarchyof Sub-CAs 114, with Root CA 112 at the virtual top of the hierarchy. Insuch a hierarchy, each Sub-CA 114 may be signed by a Sub-CA 114 abovethat Sub-CA 114 in the hierarchy to create the chain of trust.

In an embodiment, CA 102 is configured for authorization to issue,manage, revoke, and renew Certificates. CA 102 may be further configuredfor one or more of the following functions of system 100: (i) developingand maintaining certification practice statements (CPSs); (ii) issuingcompliant Certificates; (iii) securing delivery of Certificates toSubscriber(s) 106; (iv) revoking Certificates; (v) generating,protecting, operating, and destroying CA private keys; (vi) managing allaspects of CA services, operations, and infrastructure related to issuedCertificates; and (vii) acting as a trusted party to facilitateconfirmation of the binding between a public key and the identity,and/or other attributes, of the “subject” of a Certificate.

In an embodiment, CA 102 (or an issuing Sub-CA 114) generates a signeddigital Certificate that is installed on a requesting server, e.g., ofRA 104 or Subscriber 106. For example, the signed Certificate may beassociated with a website to generate a trust level for that website,and the requesting server may transmit a connection request to areceiving server using the Certificate. If the receiving servervalidates that Certificate or the signature of the Certificate, such asthrough a third party validation authority (VA, not shown in FIG. 1 ),then the receiving server approves the connection request.

In some embodiments of system 100, some or all of the respective partiesthereof are in direct or indirect operable communication with anelectronic communications network (e.g., Internet, LAN, WAN, WLAN,etc.). In at least one embodiment, one or more of the ecosystem partiesmay be in direct communication with CA 102, such as in the case whereverification of the digital identities of the respective parties isperformed by CA 102. In an exemplary embodiment, PKI-based Certificatesare utilized to implement secure communication between an authenticationof parties for each transaction, and the Certificates are issuedaccording to the X.509 standard, which defines the most commonly usedformat for public key Certificates in use today.

In an exemplary embodiment, Subscriber 106 may include a processor andan electronic memory (not shown), and store at least one application orset of computer-executable instructions within the memory. When executedby the processor, the computer-executable instructions may causeSubscriber 106 to initiate one or more of the Subscriber-related stepsof the several embodiments described herein. In some embodiments, theseSubscriber-related steps may be executed automatically upon transmittalof one or more of the several alerts described herein, and may befurther executed automatically, without the need for manualintervention.

In an embodiment, RA 104 is an entity responsible for collecting andverifying the identity of each Subscriber 106, along with any relevantinformation that is to be entered into the public key Certificate. Asillustrated in the example depicted in FIG. 1 , RA 104 interacts with CA102 such that RA 104 may enter and approve the Certificate requestinformation of Subscriber 106. In at least one embodiment, RA 104 maybe, or act in the capacity of, a Sub-CA 114 of CA 102.

In an embodiment, Management Entity 108 is an entity responsible forManagement Authority (MA) of system 100, and is configured to manage thedesign, development, and implementation of the PKI architecture onbehalf of the PKI policy authority (PA). In some embodiments, ManagementEntity 108 serves to functionally provide trust management services tosupport the ecosystem in meeting its security goals using the PKI, andfocuses on ensuring that policies for secure physical and logicalaccess, data sharing, and communications across the ecosystem arerealized through the execution and management of certificate policiesand standards.

Management Entity 108 may be further configured to provide one or moreprocesses for: (i) submitting a CPS; (ii) rules for the PA to approvethe CPS; (iii) recognizing Subscribers 106, or the authorizedrepresentatives thereof, as well as Subscriber agreements; (iv)revocation requests; (v) audits; (vi) registration of Sub-CAs 114; and(vii) registration of Subscribers 106. In some embodiments, the PA isManagement Entity 108. In other embodiments, Management Entity 108 is atrusted third party, designated by the PA to provide MA services onbehalf of the PA, and to provide operational support for the ecosystemand maintain the PKI.

In an embodiment, issued Certificates are received by Relying Parties(not shown in FIG. 1 ), which are entities capable of receiving aCertificate having a digital signature that is verifiable with thepublic key listed in the Certificate. Such Relying Parties areconsidered, for purposes of this disclosure, to be in positions capableof assessing the trust in the authentication information provided by theCertificate. That is, a Relying Party may be an entity that validatesthe binding of a public key to the name of a Subscriber 106 in a PKICertificate, and may use the Certificate to: (i) verify the integrity ofa digitally signed message; (ii) identify the initiator of acommunication; or (iii) establish confidential communications with theholder of the Certificate. In an exemplary embodiment, Subscriber 106may include without limitation any device, component, network, system,or software module that uses a PKI Certificate (e.g., includingauthority certificates, such as of CA 102, RA 104, Management Entity108, Sub-CA 114, etc.).

Exemplary operation of system 100 begins at step S116, where Subscriber106 transmits a message containing a Certificate-expiration-alert toManagement Entity 108. At step S118, Subscriber 106 sends a requestmessage to Management Entity 108 for renewal of the Certificate. In anexemplary embodiment of step S118, the renewal request is sent in thesame message from step S116 containing the expiration alert. At stepS120, Subscriber 106 submits a Certificate Signing Request (CSR, e.g., amessage conveying a request to have a Certificate issued) to RA 104 forapproval thereby.

In the case where the CSR is approved, at step S122, RA 104 sends theapproved CSR (i.e., signed by RA 104) to CA 102 for approval thereby.Upon approval by CA 102, at step S124, CA 102 sends back to RA 104 aCA-signed Certificate. At step S126, RA 104 sends the CA-signedCertificate to Subscriber 106. In an embodiment where revocation is notadditionally performed, upon completion of step S126, Subscribercompletes Certificate renewal by transmitting to Management Entity 108,in step S128, a message (or alert) indicating that the Certificate hasbeen renewed. In an exemplary embodiment, one or more of the precedingoperational steps may occur automatically.

However, in an embodiment where revocation is desired, Subscriber 106will, prior to execution of step S128, transmit to RA 104, in step S130,a self-revocation of the expiring Certificate. In step S132, RA 104notifies Revocation Management Entity of the Certificate revocation. Insome embodiments, step S132 is executed prior to execution of step S128.In other embodiments, step S132 is executed after, or simultaneouslywith, step S128.

According to the innovative design of system 100, in the case of a PKISubscriber already having a valid (but expiring) Certificate, system 100is enabled to not only automatically renew the expiring Certificate, butalso to issue the renewed Certificate issued online at nearly the samesecurity level as used to protect keys for the expiring Certificate. Inthe exemplary embodiment, the renewal Certificate is issued prior toexpiration of the expiring Certificate. That is, according to the uniquesystem of alerts described herein, Certificate renewal is readily andefficiently achieved prior to Certificate expiration. In an exemplaryembodiment, a system of alert-, event-, and/or alarm-messages providedawareness to Subscriber 106, Management Entity 108, and/or system 100 ofthe status of a Certificate such that system 100 is advantageouslyenabled to perform proactive management and monitoring of issuedCertificates.

In some embodiments, the proactive management alerts may be furtherenhanced through leveraging of custom extensions, such as “use before”,“use after”, or other custom extensions that enable proactive managementof the timing of Certificate renewals prior to expiration. According tothis proactive management scheme, other profile information stored inthe Certificates may be used instead of, or in addition to, theseextensions. In other embodiments, system may be configured such thatpeers (e.g., VA, etc.) configured to authenticate Subscriber 106 mayoptionally notify management servers (e.g., Management Entity 108) ofexpiring Certificates.

In some instances, Certificate lifetimes extensions may be implementedto identify a longest period for which Subscriber 106 may be issued arenewed Certificate, which may be of particular value for devicecertifications, licensing, end-of-life design limits, or other devicemanagement functions.

Upon successful use of a new Certificate by Subscriber 106, Subscriber106 may be further enabled to revoke the expiring Certificate (i.e.,self-revocation) and perform key destruction. In an exemplary embodimentof this scenario, the private key is necessarily deleted, but deletionof the public key is optional. In an embodiment, the self-revocationsub-process may further delete the revoked Certificate to more securelyensure that the expiring Certificate cannot be misused prior to itsexpiration, that is, in the period after the new/renewal Certificate hasbeen issued, but before the expiring Certificate has actually expired.In an exemplary embodiment, the revocation message from Subscriber 106is signed by the expiring Certificate (i.e., prior to expiration).

In at least one embodiment, in the case where use, by Subscriber 106, ofthe new Certificate fails, system 100 may operate such that the newCertificate is automatically revoked. In an exemplary embodiment of thisscenario, the revocation message for the new Certificate from Subscriber106 is signed by the expiring Certificate, and not by the newCertificate, for which usage has failed.

FIG. 2 is a sequence diagram illustrating an exemplary certificaterenewal process 200. In an exemplary embodiment, process 200 illustratessteps relating to renewal of an expiring Certificate, which may beperformed, for example, over system 100, FIG. 1 , and throughinteraction of parties thereto, including at least Subscriber 106, RA104, Management Entity 108, and CA 102. When implemented, process 200may execute the following steps, which are not necessarily required tobe in the order listed, except where so clearly designated as beingdependent on a prior step. That is, unless otherwise described herein tothe contrary, process 200 may execute one or more of the following stepsin any particular order, sequentially or in parallel, and/orsubstantially simultaneously.

In an exemplary embodiment, process 200 begins at step 202, in which atleast one Certificate of Subscriber 106 reaches apre-certificate-expiration threshold (e.g., an expiration date, a “usebefore” custom extension, etc.). In step 204, Subscriber 106 sends aCertificate-expiration-alert to Management Entity 108. In an exemplaryembodiment of step 204, the Certificate-expiration-alert is a messagecontaining an alert, alarm, or event timing message used for proactivemonitoring of the status of the expiring Certificate. Step 206 isoptional. In step 206, Subscriber 106 gathers additional information (ifany), and/or performs any additional analysis or verification, requiredby Management Entity 108.

In step 208, Subscriber 106 requests a renewal from Management Entity108 of the expiring Certificate. In some embodiments of step 208, therenewal request is contained in the same message containing theCertificate-expiration-alert from step 204. In at least one embodimentof step 208, the renewal request contains a message from Subscriber 106requesting that Management Entity 108 begins a renewal subprocess, ormay include a renewal-process-begin-alert.

In step 210, Subscriber 106 generates new keys, and creates a CSR, forthe Certificate renewal. In an exemplary embodiment of step 210,Subscriber 106 creates the new Certificate, or a draft thereof. In step212, Subscriber 106 submits the CSR to RA 104 for approval. In step 214,RA 104 evaluates the CSR submission from Subscriber 106, renders adecision on the CSR, and upon an approval decision thereby, signs theCSR. In step 216, RA 104 transmits the approved (i.e., signed by RA 104)CSR to CA 102. In step 218, CA 102 evaluates the RA-approved CSR from RA104, renders a decision on the CSR, and upon an approval decisionthereby, signs a new/renewal Certificate. In step 220, CA 102 transmitsthe CA-signed Certificate to RA 104, and in step 222, RA 104 sends theCA-signed Certificate to Subscriber 106.

In step 224, Subscriber 106 notifies Management Entity 108 of the newCertificate. In an exemplary embodiment of step 224, the notificationfrom Subscriber 106 includes a Certificate-renewed-alert. In some casesthough, this system of proactive renewal alerts may leave a period oftime, between issuance of the new/renewal Certificate and actualexpiration of the expiring Certificate, in which the expiringCertificate should not be used, but a party may nevertheless attempt todo so. In such cases, the automated management techniques herein mayfurther include automatic revocation capabilities for Subscriber 106.

FIG. 3 is a sequence diagram illustrating an enhanced certificaterenewal process 300. In an exemplary embodiment, process 300 is similarto process 200, FIG. 2 , and may also be performed with respect system100, FIG. 1 , and through interaction of Subscriber 106, RA 104,Management Entity 108, and CA 102. In contrast to process 200, process300 may further include the interactive participation of one or moreecosystem parties with Revocation Management Entity 110. In an exemplaryembodiment Revocation Management Entity is an OCSP of the PKI. Process300 may otherwise operate similarly to process 200.

In an exemplary embodiment, process 300 begins at step 302, in which atleast one Certificate of Subscriber 106 reaches apre-certificate-expiration threshold (e.g., an expiration date, a “usebefore” custom extension, etc.). In step 304, Subscriber 106 sends aCertificate-expiration-alert to Management Entity 108. In an exemplaryembodiment of step 304, the Certificate-expiration-alert is a messagecontaining an alert, alarm, or event timing message used for proactivemonitoring of the status of the expiring Certificate. Step 306 isoptional. In step 306, Subscriber 106 gathers additional information (ifany), and/or performs any additional analysis or verification, requiredby Management Entity 108.

In step 308, Subscriber 106 requests a renewal from Management Entity108 of the expiring Certificate. In some embodiments of step 308, therenewal request is contained in the same message containing theCertificate-expiration-alert from step 304. In at least one embodimentof step 308, the renewal request contains a message from Subscriber 106requesting that Management Entity 108 begins a renewal subprocess, ormay include a renewal-process-begin-alert.

In step 310, Subscriber 106 generates new keys, and creates a CSR, forthe Certificate renewal. In an exemplary embodiment of step 310,Subscriber 106 creates the new Certificate, or a draft thereof. In step312, Subscriber 106 submits the CSR to RA 104 for approval. In step 314,RA 104 evaluates the CSR submission from Subscriber 106, renders adecision on the CSR, and upon an approval decision thereby, signs theCSR. In step 316, RA 104 transmits the approved (i.e., signed by RA 104)CSR to CA 102. In step 318, CA 102 evaluates the RA-approved CSR from RA104, renders a decision on the CSR, and upon an approval decisionthereby, signs a new/renewal Certificate. In step 320, CA 102 transmitsthe CA-signed Certificate to RA 104, and in step 322, RA 104 sends theCA-signed Certificate to Subscriber 106.

In step 324, Subscriber 106 attempts to use the new Certificate and thekeys associated therewith. In step 326, if use of the new Certificatewas successful in step 324, self-revocation of the old, expiringCertificate is implemented. For example, process 300 may automate themanagement of the revocation subprocess such that Subscriber 106 isenabled to revoke the expiring Certificate, to further prevent theexpiring Certificate from being misused prior to its expiration (i.e.,in the period after the new/renewal Certificate has been issued, butbefore the expiring Certificate has actually expired), and perform keydestruction of one or more keys. In some embodiments of this scenario ofstep 324, Subscriber 106 performs key destruction by deleting both theprivate key and the public key of the old, expiring Certificate. Inother embodiments of this scenario of step 324, Subscriber 106 deletesonly the private key. In at least one embodiment of this scenario ofstep 324, Subscriber 106 deletes the old, expiring Certificate.

If, however, in step 324, use of the new Certificate was not successful,in step 326, revocation of the new, unsuccessful Certificate isalternatively implemented. For example, in this alternative scenario,Subscriber 106 is instead enabled to revoke the new Certificate. In anembodiment of this scenario of step 324, Subscriber 106 implementsrevocation by deleting the new Certificate, and may also delete one orboth of the private key and the public key associated with the revokednew Certificate.

In step 328, RA 104 notifies Revocation Management Entity 110 of theCertificate revocation performed in step 326, that is, revocation of theold Certificate in the case of successful use of the new Certificate, orelse revocation of the new Certificate. In this manner, RevocationManagement Entity 110 (e.g., the OCSP) may be notified of revokedCertificates in real-time, thus providing yet another level of securityagainst misuse of expiring Certificate after renewal but prior to actualexpiration. In step 330, Subscriber 106 notifies Management Entity 108of the Certificate renewal, if successfully used, and of the Certificaterevocation, whether old or new. In an exemplary embodiment of step 330,the notification from Subscriber 106 includes submission of aCertificate-renewed-and-revocation alert. In both revocation scenarios,the Certificate-renewed-alert-and-revocation alert of step 330 is signed(e.g., using the private key) by the expiring Certificate (i.e., priorto the revocation thereof).

According to the innovative systems and methods described herein,automatic certificate renewal may be implemented under significantlyadvanced security considerations. In exemplary embodiments of theseadvanced security schemes, Subscribers (e.g., Subscriber 106) is enabledto support at least two key pairs and Certificates simultaneously,namely, (i) the Certificate and key pair of the expiring Certificate,and (ii) the Certificate and key pair of the new Certificate. Forexample, irrespective of which Certificate is revoked (i.e., old ornew), both Certificates and key pairs will coexist with the Subscriberuntil one of the Certificates is revoked (e.g., according to process300).

In the exemplary embodiment, upon receipt of the CA-signed Certificate,for example, through RA 104, Subscribers 106 may be further configuredor automatically instructed to reinitiate all security associations(e.g., network access, secure transport, etc.). After all relevantsecurity associations have been successfully re-established andauthenticated, Subscribers 106 may then submit the revocation notice ofthe expiring Certificate (e.g., step 330, FIG. 3 ), where the notice issigned using the private key of the expiring Certificate, and thendestroy the expiring Certificate key pair and delete the correspondingold Certificate.

Alternatively, in the case where all of the relevant Certificateassociations are not successfully authenticated and established,Subscriber 106 may instead revert back to the expiring Certificate andassociated keys. In some instances of this alternative, appropriate failconditions and remediation may be further specified without departingfrom the scope herein. For example, it may be desirable that such failconditions account for the possibility that renewal of the expiringCertificate may be validly attempted again, whether according to theseautomated management techniques or by manual intervention by anoperator. In this scenario, the newly issued keys should first bedestroyed, and the new Certificate revoked (i.e., signed by the key ofthe expiring Certificate), before the renewal process is re-initiated.In this manner, RA 104 (which may have already authorized payment forthe renewal Certificate), may not be required to allow the request foranother Certificate renewal until RA 104 is able to verify that theprevious, but failed, renewal Certificate has been, in fact, revoked.

Accordingly, the embodiments described herein improve upon existingtechnologies, and also improve the functionality of computers, byautomating the management of processes for automatically renewingdigital Certificates. The present embodiments thus improve the speed,efficiency, and accuracy in which automatic processes may be performed.In light of these improvements, the present embodiments providecomputer-related solutions for more efficiently automating conventionaltechniques requiring manual input, and further address computer-relatedissues regarding, for example, digital security.

Accordingly, the innovative systems and methods described herein are ofparticular value within the realm of secure Internet communications. Thepresent embodiments enable more reliable updating and monitoring of suchcommunications, but without compromising data and speed. Furthermore,according to the disclosed techniques, user computer device are betterable to monitor and determine the security of websites and otherconnected devices, and thereby protecting computer devices frommalicious actors.

Exemplary embodiments of systems and methods for automating managementof automatic renewals and revocations of digital Certificates aredescribed above in detail. The systems and methods of this disclosurethough, are not limited to only the specific embodiments describedherein, but rather, the components and/or steps of their implementationmay be utilized independently and separately from other componentsand/or steps described herein.

Although specific features of various embodiments may be shown in somedrawings and not in others, this is for convenience only. In accordancewith the principles of the systems and methods described herein, anyfeature of a drawing may be referenced or claimed in combination withany feature of any other drawing.

Some embodiments involve the use of one or more electronic or computingdevices. Such devices typically include a processor, processing device,or controller, such as a general purpose central processing unit (CPU),a graphics processing unit (GPU), a microcontroller, a reducedinstruction set computer (RISC) processor, an application specificintegrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic circuit (PLC), aprogrammable logic unit (PLU), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), adigital signal processing (DSP) device, and/or any other circuit orprocessing device capable of executing the functions described herein.The methods described herein may be encoded as executable instructionsembodied in a computer readable medium, including, without limitation, astorage device and/or a memory device. Such instructions, when executedby a processing device, cause the processing device to perform at leasta portion of the methods described herein. The above examples areexemplary only, and thus are not intended to limit in any way thedefinition and/or meaning of the term processor and processing device.

This written description uses examples to disclose the embodiments,including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in theart to practice the embodiments, including making and using any devicesor systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scopeof the disclosure is defined by the claims, and may include otherexamples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples areintended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structuralelements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, orif they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantialdifferences from the literal language of the claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. An electronic device configured for automaticrenewal of a public key infrastructure (PKI) certificate issued by acertificate authority (CA), comprising: a processor; and a memory inoperable communication with the processor and configured to (a) storethe PKI certificate therein, and (b) have computer-executableinstructions encoded therein, which, when executed by the processor,cause the processor to: (i) transmit a first alert to a managemententity for initiating renewal of the PKI certificate; (ii) transmit acertificate signing request (CSR) to a registration authority (RA) incommunication with the CA, for generation of an RA-signed CSR to the CA;(iii) receiving, from the RA, an issued renewal certificate signed bythe CA; and (iv) transmit a second alert to the management entityindicating renewal of the PKI certificate, wherein the issued renewalcertificate signed by the CA is based on the RA-signed CSR, wherein thefirst alert includes (a) a certificate expiration alert having at leastone notification message regarding a status and an expiration date ofthe PKI certificate, and (b) a renewal initiation alert, and wherein thePKI certificate includes profile information having at least oneextension indicating a renewal timing of the PKI certificate.
 2. Theelectronic device of claim 1, wherein the instructions further cause theprocessor to transmit the certificate expiration alert simultaneouslywith the renewal initiation alert.
 3. The electronic device of claim 1,wherein the instructions further cause the processor to transmit thecertificate expiration alert before the renewal initiation alert.
 4. Theelectronic device of claim 1, wherein the certificate expiration alertof the first alert originates from a peer device of the electronicdevice.
 5. The electronic device of claim 1, wherein the instructionsfurther cause the processor to transmit the first alert automaticallyupon meeting the renewal timing of the at least one extension.
 6. Theelectronic device of claim 1, wherein the at least one extensionincludes a certificate lifetime extension.
 7. An electronic deviceconfigured for automatic renewal of a public key infrastructure (PKI)certificate issued by a certificate authority (CA), comprising: aprocessor; and a memory in operable communication with the processor andconfigured to (a) store the PKI certificate therein, and (b) havecomputer-executable instructions encoded therein, which, when executedby the processor, cause the processor to: (i) transmit a first alert toa management entity for initiating renewal of the PKI certificate; (ii)transmit a certificate signing request (CSR) to a registration authority(RA) in communication with the CA, for generation of an RA-signed CSR tothe CA; (iii) receiving, from the RA, an issued renewal certificatesigned by the CA; and (iv) transmit, prior to expiration of the PKIcertificate, a second alert to the management entity indicating renewalof the PKI certificate, wherein the issued renewal certificate signed bythe CA is based on the RA-signed CSR.
 8. The electronic device of claim7, wherein the CSR includes at least one new key pair generated by thesubscriber for the renewal certificate.
 9. The electronic device ofclaim 8, wherein the CSR further includes at a draft of the renewalcertificate.
 10. The electronic device of claim 9, wherein theinstructions further cause the processor to use the issued renewalcertificate and the new key pair prior to transmitting the second alert.11. The electronic device of claim 10, wherein the second alert includesa certificate revocation alert signed with a private key of an originalkey pair associated with the PKI certificate.
 12. The electronic deviceof claim 11, wherein the instructions further cause the processor torevoke at least one of the PKI certificate and the issued renewalcertificate.
 13. The electronic device of claim 11, wherein theinstructions further cause the processor to revoke the PKI certificateupon successful use of the issued renewal certificate and the new keypair.
 14. The electronic device of claim 13, wherein the instructionsfurther cause the processor to delete the revoked PKI certificate and aprivate key of an original key pair associated with the revoked PKIcertificate.
 15. The electronic device of claim 14, wherein theinstructions further cause the processor to delete a public key of theoriginal key pair associated with the revoked PKI certificate.
 16. Theelectronic device of claim 11, wherein the instructions further causethe processor to revoke the issued renewal certificate upon a failed useof the issued renewal certificate and the new key pair.
 17. Theelectronic device of claim 16, wherein the instructions further causethe processor to delete the issued renewal certificate.